Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Blog Assignment #4

Part One

1.Laws are made to protect society us and keep us in line.Laws tell you what is acceptable and not acceptable.basically, what is right and what is wrong. Ethics is what is morally right and wrong.So the relationship is that many laws are made on the premis-is it ethical?Does the general society believe this?Thats why laws vary where ever you go, because the culture of a country (or even a state) can have different values and believes on ethical issues. For example, the issue of gay marriage.It is legal in some states and not in others.Thats the relationship between law and ethics, ethics determines laws.



2.I learned that law and ethics form a problematic package,but a package deal nonetheless.You cant have laws without ethics,and you cant have ethics without law.Also that law must apply to everyone equally. It must also be possible for each citizen to embrace the reasoning behind the law, including any penalties for violating the law.In some cases the legal obligation conflicts with the ethical obligation.You may feel an ethical obligation to something, but have no legal obligation. Like helping out someone who is suffering.URL-http://www-hsc.usc.edu/~mbernste/tae.ethics&law.herrera.html



3.Arguable Issue: The arguable issue is whether or not we need ethics, given that we already have laws.

Conclusion: we do need ethics even though we have laws.

Premises:

(1)Ethics is the base of many laws.

(2)There would be no laws without ethics, nobody would have a view of what is right and wrong.

(3)Ethics gives us a sense of what is a just punishment for a law being broken.



Conclusion:we dont need ethics because we already have laws.

Premises:

(1)Laws already provide us with a sense of what is right and what is wrong.

(2)Laws already have a set punishment for crimes against them.

(3)Ethics could cause unjust laws for some, because of a majority belief on a given topic.



Part Two

Majority View

1.Majority view is how the majority of people feel on a given subject and whether or not it is right to make a law or rule based on how the majority feel.One example is pologamy, the majority of people in the U.S.,a well as me...just clearing that up, feel that it should be against the law therefor it is.But in other cultures it is an accepted part of every day life, so should majority view take that right away?.....Well most people believe so.

2.Arguable Issue: The arguable issue is whether or not the Majority View is a reliable basis for ethical decision-making.

Conclusion:Majority view is not a reliable basis for ethical decisicion-making.
Premises:
(1)Majority view cuts out the rights of the minority.
(2)It dosent solve the problem in an ethical way, it combines personal views.
(3)Just because the majority of people think something is right, it does not make it right.

The Role Of Feelings
1.The role of feelings is how you personally feel about something and whether or not it is right to base your decision on how you feel.Feelings are influenced by what is around you or what is happening to you at a given time.Feelings are basically your own personal belief on something because of past experiences.
2.Arguable Issue: The arguable issue is whether or not our feelings are a reliable basis for ethical decision-making.
Conclusion:Feelings are not a reliable basis for ethical decision-making.
Premises:
(1)Feelings can change over time.
(2)You can make a rash decision based on your feelings at the moment and later regret it.
(3)Feelings can get in the way of rational thinking, they cloud your judgement.
Part Three
The ability to express yourself in your own words is essential in this class. Did you put everything in your own words this time?
Yes, I only put what I believed and how I felt.
What was easiest / hardest about this assignment?
The easiest part was the arguments because I just put what I believed. The hardest part was just the length of the assignment.
How will you apply what you learned through this assignment to your everyday life?
I will make rash decisions, not based on my emotions at the time or on how the majority feel, but rather on what I beleive in and is ethical.
How well do you think you did on this assignment? Explain.
I believe I did good on this assignment, because I put fourth the time and effort and gave the best possible answers that I could.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Blog Assignment #2

1. Were the questions on the Moral Sense Test difficult to answer (psychologically, emotionally, conceptually, technically, etc.)? Why or why not? Do you think your responses to the Moral Sense Test questions were consistent? Does this matter?
- They were difficult to answer because every scenerio offered two tough choices between saving something that is important to you at the expenese of someone else, or giving up what is important to you to protect someone else. Yes my responses were consistant and this is important because it shows how you judge somebody depending on how they handle the situation and what you would do differently. It shows you what kind of person you really are at heart.

2. Should people always follow the law? Why or why not? When might one be justified in NOT following the law? Give examples.
- People should always follow the law, the only time it would be justified to break the law is when it is necessary to survive. A perfect example of this is if your wife is pregnant and she is going into labor, you should be able to go above the speed limit to get her to the hospital. Another example is self defense.

3. In your own words, explain what "social convention" means. Give examples.
- Social convention is what is common in a particular region, like customs and rituals. An example of this would be sign of respect. In America we great each other with hand shakes or speech, but in other cultures they greet each other with kisses to the cheek or bowing.

4. Should people always follow the conventions of their society? Why or why not? Give examples.
- I dont believe people should always follow the conventions in their society. My reason why is because a person's individual belief might differ than that of another society. An example of this would be bull fighting, which can be generally accepted in a society but some individuals in that society might see differently and think that it is cruel.

5. Should people always follow their own principles? Why or why not? Give examples.
- People should always follow there own principles. They should not let society make ones self go against there own morals or beliefs. For example like bull fighting, one shouldnt be a bull fighter if they believe bull fighting is unethical.

6. Explain in your own words the difference between socially acceptable, legally acceptable, and morally acceptable.
- Socially acceptable is something that a particular all agrees on, different society have different cultures. Legally acceptable follows the guidelines of the laws. Morally acceptable is what you feel is morally right for a given situation.

7. Out of 25 points, how many points do you feel your work on this assignment deserves? Justify your answer.
- 25 because I answered all the question, on time with more than one sentence. I also took my time and answered each question to the best of my ability. I also actually answered the survey and read all of it.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Blog Assignment #1

1. How would you have explained the meaning of the term "ethics", before taking this class?
-I always thought of ethics as the choice between what is morally right verses wrong based on your own experience or outlook on the situation.

2. What are some of your deepest held values?
-My deepest values are my family and friends.I love both of them more than anything.

3. What are some main principles you try to live your life by?
-To always do "the right thing" and work as hard as I can but still have fun.

4. What moral qualities do you look for in others?
-Reliability and trust. If I cant rely on you I cant trust you and vice versa.

5. How were your values and principles developed?
-Most of my values and principles come from my upbringing and past experiences.

6. How have your values and principles changed throughout your life so far?
- When was little I never had to work for anything I had and took them for granted like when my mom used to do laundry for me and my dad did yardwork and provided for us.Hard work was never important to me and now I realize that everything we have thats truly worth anything is earned.

7. Out of 25 points, how many points do you feel your work on this assignment deserves? Justify your answer.
-25 because I answered all the questions honestly and to the best of my ability.